Basic HTML Version
Persecution in the First Centuries
27
herself from falsehood and idolatry. They saw that separation was an
absolute necessity if they would obey the word of God. They dared
not tolerate errors fatal to their own souls, and set an example which
would imperil the faith of their children and children’s children. To
secure peace and unity they were ready to make any concession
consistent with fidelity to God; but they felt that even peace would
be too dearly purchased at the sacrifice of principle. If unity could
be secured only by the compromise of truth and righteousness, then
let there be difference, and even war.
Well would it be for the church and the world if the principles
that actuated those steadfast souls were revived in the hearts of God’s
professed people. There is an alarming indifference in regard to the
doctrines which are the pillars of the Christian faith. The opinion
is gaining ground, that, after all, these are not of vital importance.
This degeneracy is strengthening the hands of the agents of Satan,
so that false theories and fatal delusions which the faithful in ages
[47]
past imperiled their lives to resist and expose, are now regarded with
favor by thousands who claim to be followers of Christ.
The early Christians were indeed a peculiar people. Their blame-
less deportment and unswerving faith were a continual reproof that
disturbed the sinner’s peace. Though few in numbers, without
wealth, position, or honorary titles, they were a terror to evil-doers
wherever their character and doctrines were known. Therefore they
were hated by the wicked, even as Abel was hated by the ungodly
Cain. For the same reason that Cain slew Abel did those who would
throw off the restraint of the Holy Spirit, put to death God’s people.
It was for the same reason that the Jews rejected and crucified the
Saviour,—because the purity and holiness of his character was a
constant rebuke to their selfishness and corruption. From the days
of Christ until now, his faithful disciples have excited the hatred and
opposition of those who love and follow the ways of sin.
How, then, can the gospel be called a message of peace? When
Isaiah foretold the birth of the Messiah, he ascribed to him the title,
“Prince of peace.” When angels announced to the shepherds that
Christ was born, they sung above the plains of Bethlehem, “Glory to
God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.” [
Luke
2:14
.] There is a seeming contradiction between these prophetic
declarations and the words of Christ, “I came not to send peace, but