Chapter 8—Daniel’s Integrity Under Test
The prophet Daniel was an illustrious character. He was a bright
example of what men may become when united with the God of
wisdom. A brief account of the life of this holy man of God is left on
record for the encouragement of those who should afterward be called
to endure trial and temptation.
When the people of Israel, their king, nobles, and priests, were
carried into captivity, four of their number were selected to serve in
the court of the king of Babylon. One of these was Daniel, who early
gave promise of the remarkable ability developed in later years. These
youth were all of princely birth, and are described as “children in
whom was no blemish, but well-favored, and skillful in all wisdom,
and cunning in knowledge, and understanding science, and such as
had ability in them.” Perceiving the superior talents of these youthful
captives, King Nebuchadnezzar determined to prepare them to fill
important positions in his kingdom. That they might be fully qualified
for their life at court, according to Oriental custom, they were to be
taught the language of the Chaldeans, and to be subjected for three
years to a thorough course of physical and intellectual discipline.
The youth in this school of training were not only to be admitted to
the royal palace, but it was provided that they should eat of the meat,
and drink of the wine, which came from the king’s table. In all this
the king considered that he was not only bestowing great honor upon
them, but securing for them the best physical and mental development
that could be obtained.
Among the viands placed before the king were swine’s flesh and
other meats which were declared unclean by the law of Moses, and
which the Hebrews had been expressly forbidden to eat. Here Daniel
was brought to a severe test. Should he adhere to the teachings of
his fathers concerning meats and drinks, and offend the king, and
[78]
probably lose not only his position but his life? or should he disregard
the commandment of the Lord, and retain the favor of the king, thus
62