582
      
      
         The Great Controversy
      
      
        the laity shows up as negative. See for example G. P. Fisher, The
      
      
        Reformation, Ch. 15, Par. 16 (1873 ed., pp. 530-532); J. Cardinal
      
      
         [692]
      
      
        Gibbons, The Faith of Our Fathers, ch. 8 (49th ed., 1897), pp. 98-117;
      
      
        John Dowling, History of Romanism, b. 7, ch. 2, sec. 14; and b. 9,
      
      
        ch. 3, secs. 24-27 (1871 ed., pp. 491-496, 621-625); L. F. Bungener,
      
      
        History of the Council of Trent, pp. 101-110 (2d Edinburgh ed., 1853,
      
      
        translated by D. D. Scott); G. H. Putnam, Books and Their Makers
      
      
        During the Middle Ages, vol. 1, pt. 2, ch. 2, pars. 49, 54-56. See
      
      
        also Index of Prohibited Books (Vatican Polyglot Press, 1930), pp. IX,
      
      
        X; Timothy Hurley, A Commentary on the Present Index Legislation
      
      
        (New York: Benziger Brothers, 1908), p. 71; Translation of the Great
      
      
        Encyclical Letters of Leo XIII (New York: Benziger Brothers, 1903),
      
      
        p. 413.
      
      
        But in recent years a dramatic and positive change has occurred in
      
      
        this respect. On the one hand, the church has approved several versions
      
      
        prepared on the basis of the original languages; on the other, it has
      
      
        promoted the study of the Holy Scriptures by means of free distribution
      
      
        and Bible institutes. The church, however, continues to reserve for
      
      
        herself the exclusive right to interpret the Bible in the light of her own
      
      
        tradition, thus justifying those doctrines that do not harmonize with
      
      
        Biblical teachings.
      
      
        Page 373. Ascension Robes.—The story that the Adventists made
      
      
        robes with which to ascend “to meet the Lord in the air,” was invented
      
      
        by those who wished to reproach the Advent preaching. It was circu-
      
      
        lated so industriously that many believed it, but careful inquiry proved
      
      
        its falsity. For many years a substantial reward was offered for proof
      
      
        that one such instance ever occurred, but no proof has been produced.
      
      
        None who loved the appearing of the Saviour were so ignorant of the
      
      
        teachings of the Scriptures as to suppose that robes which they could
      
      
        make would be necessary for that occasion. The only robe which the
      
      
        saints will need to meet the Lord is the righteousness of Christ. See
      
      
        Isaiah 61:10
      
      
        ;
      
      
         Revelation 19:8
      
      
        .
      
      
        For a thorough refutation of the legend of ascension robes, see
      
      
        Francis D. Nichol, Midnight Cry (Washington, D.C.: Review and
      
      
        Herald Publishing Assn., 1944), chs. 25-27, and Appendices H-J. See
      
      
        also Leroy Edwin Froom, Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers (Washington,
      
      
        D.C.: Review and Herald Publishing Assn., 1954), vol. 4, pp. 822-826.