Basic HTML Version
Chapter 25—Extremes in Diet
Not all who profess to believe in diet reform are really reform-
ers. With many the reform consists merely in discarding certain
unwholesome foods. They do not understand clearly the principles
of health. Their tables, still loaded with rich foods and delicacies, are
far from being an example of Christian temperance and moderation.
Another class, in their desire to set a right example, go to the
opposite extreme. If they are unable to obtain the most desirable
foods, they adopt an impoverished diet instead of using such things as
would best supply the lack. Their food does not supply the elements
needed to make good blood. Their health suffers, their usefulness is
impaired, and their example turns people against reform in diet.
Others think that since health requires a simple diet, one need
give little thought to choosing or preparing food. Some restrict
themselves to a very meager diet that lacks enough variety to supply
the needs of the system, and they suffer in consequence.
Those who have but a partial understanding of the principles of
reform are often the most rigid, not only in carrying out their views
themselves but in urging them on their families and their neighbors.
The effect of their mistaken reforms, as seen in their own ill health
and their efforts to force their views upon others, give many a false
idea of reform in diet and lead them to reject it altogether.
Those who understand the laws of health and who are governed
by principle shun both the extremes of indulgence and of restriction.
Their diet is chosen, not for the mere gratification of appetite, but
for the upbuilding of the body. They seek to preserve every power
[179]
in the best condition for highest service to God and man. Appetite
is under the control of reason and conscience, and they are rewarded
with health of body and mind. They do not urge their views offen-
sively upon others, but their example is a testimony in favor of right
principles. These persons have a wide influence for good.
There is real common sense in diet reform. The subject should
be studied broadly and deeply, and we should not criticize others
217