56
      
      
         Patriarchs and Prophets
      
      
        determined to follow his own will. As the eldest, he felt above being
      
      
        admonished by his brother, and despised his counsel.
      
      
        Cain came before God with murmuring and infidelity in his heart
      
      
        in regard to the promised sacrifice and the necessity of the sacrificial
      
      
        offerings. His gift expressed no penitence for sin. He felt, as many
      
      
        now feel, that it would be an acknowledgment of weakness to follow
      
      
        the exact plan marked out by God, of trusting his salvation wholly to
      
      
        the atonement of the promised Saviour. He chose the course of self-
      
      
        dependence. He would come in his own merits. He would not bring
      
      
        the lamb, and mingle its blood with his offering, but would present his
      
      
        fruits, the products of his labor. He presented his offering as a favor
      
      
        done to God, through which he expected to secure the divine approval.
      
      
        Cain obeyed in building an altar, obeyed in bringing a sacrifice; but he
      
      
        rendered only a partial obedience. The essential part, the recognition
      
      
        of the need of a Redeemer, was left out.
      
      
        So far as birth and religious instruction were concerned, these
      
      
        brothers were equal. Both were sinners, and both acknowledged the
      
      
        claims of God to reverence and worship. To outward appearance
      
      
        their religion was the same up to a certain point, but beyond this the
      
      
        difference between the two was great.
      
      
        “By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than
      
      
        Cain.”
      
      
         Hebrews 11:4
      
      
        . Abel grasped the great principles of redemption.
      
      
        He saw himself a sinner, and he saw sin and its penalty, death, standing
      
      
        between his soul and communion with God. He brought the slain
      
      
        victim, the sacrificed life, thus acknowledging the claims of the law
      
      
        that had been transgressed. Through the shed blood he looked to the
      
      
        future sacrifice, Christ dying on the cross of Calvary; and trusting in
      
      
        the atonement that was there to be made, he had the witness that he
      
      
        was righteous, and his offering accepted.
      
      
        Cain had the same opportunity of learning and accepting these
      
      
        truths as had Abel. He was not the victim of an arbitrary purpose. One
      
      
        brother was not elected to be accepted of God, and the other to be
      
      
        rejected. Abel chose faith and obedience; Cain, unbelief and rebellion.
      
      
        Here the whole matter rested.
      
      
        Cain and Abel represent two classes that will exist in the world till
      
      
        the close of time. One class avail themselves of the appointed sacrifice
      
      
         [73]
      
      
        for sin; the other venture to depend upon their own merits; theirs is
      
      
        a sacrifice without the virtue of divine mediation, and thus it is not