Christ’s Example In Contrast With Formalism
119
The brothers and sisters of Jesus were taught the multitudinous
traditions and ceremonies of the rabbis, but Christ himself could not
be induced to interest himself in these matters. While hearing on
every hand the reiterated “Thou shalt,” and “Thou shalt not,” he moved
independently of these restrictions. The requirements of society and
the requirements of God were ever in collision; and while in his youth
he made no direct attack upon the customs or precepts of the learned
teachers, he did not become a student in their schools.
Jesus would not follow any custom that would require him to depart
from the will of God, nor would he place himself under the instruction
of those who exalted the words of men above the word of God. He
shut out of his mind all the sentiments and formalities that had not
God for their foundation. He would give no place for these things to
influence him. Thus he taught that it is better to prevent evil than to
attempt to correct it after it has gained a foothold in the mind. And
Jesus would not by his example lead others to place themselves where
they would be corrupted. Nor would he needlessly place himself in
[162]
a position where he would be brought into conflict with the rabbis,
which might in after years result in weakening his influence with the
people. For the same reasons he could not be induced to observe
the meaningless forms or rehearse the maxims that afterward in his
ministry he so decidedly condemned.
Though Jesus was subject to his parents, he began at a very early
age to act for himself in the formation of his character. While his
mother was his first human teacher, he was constantly receiving an
education from his Father in heaven. Instead of poring over the learned
lore handed down by the rabbis from century to century, Jesus, under
the Divine Teacher, studied the words of God, pure and uncorrupted,
and studied also the great lesson-book of nature. The words, “Thus
saith the Lord,” were ever upon his lips, and “It is written,” was his
reason for every act that varied from the family customs. He brought
a purer atmosphere into the home life. Though he did not place him-
self under the instruction of the rabbis by becoming a student in their
schools, yet he was often brought in contact with them, and the ques-
tions he asked, as if he were a learner, puzzled the wise men; for their
practises did not harmonize with the Scriptures, and they had not the
wisdom that comes from God. Even to those who were displeased at